“We are happy the court denied the core of Walmart’s motion and are looking forward to continuing to litigate this case to seek justice for our client,” said Justin K. Gelfand of Margulis Gelfand in St. Louis, who is representing the plaintiff.       

According to the complaint, one of those air diffuser patents expired five years ago, but Bath & Body Works was still paying royalties. Now, it wants its $74 million back.       

U.S. District Judge Lindsay C. Jenkins for the Northern District of Illinois declined to grant summary judgment on plaintiff American Wire’s claims for breach of an indemnification clause against Wind Turbines and Energy Cables Corp. (WTEC), which had previously agreed to indemnify the plaintiff against certain claims relating to defective electric cables.       

Koch, in conjunction with longtime counsel Baker Botts and the Louisiana Office of Motor Vehicles, received the Pro Bono Institute’s 2025 Corporate Pro Bono Partner Award, for legal clinics helping people in a rural Louisiana parish get driver licenses restored or renewed.       

According to the plaintiff, Datavault AI, all it took was a bad review and a barrage of negative social media posts from the financial research and due diligence firm, Wolfpack Research, to put the company’s reputation in a tailspin.       

A New York-based collections company claimed in a lawsuit that the firm failed to negotiate terms regarding a 3% prepayment penalty in a $30 million financing agreement.       

Veralto said in August that it was parting ways with the legal chief who took the company public two years ago.       

U.S. Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen of the Eastern District of Missouri approved the class action settlement in a data breach class action against Nahon, Saharovich & Trotz, and granted the motion for fees and costs to be awarded to the data breach and employment firm Cole & Van Note, which represented the plaintiff, Susan

David Leopold, who was chair of the immigration practice group at UB Greensfelder, leads the team that jumped to Thompson Hine and expanded its immigration practice at a time when the corporate immigration practice is experiencing high demand.       

“Rule 11 does not operate as a ‘fee-shifting measure’ or allow for any prevailing party on a motion to dismiss to bring sanctions. Rather, Rule 11 sanctions are a ‘tool that must be used with utmost care and caution.’ Defendants have failed to meet the high burden to establish they are entitled to Rule 11