Ex-Clients’ Malpractice Suit Against Ohio Attorney, Firm Reinstated for Representation in Underlying Child Custody Matter

“We do not find that, based on the allegations in the Amended Complaint, the asserted casual connection between Dicke’s conduct and the Resors’ loss is too speculative as a matter of law to sufficiently plead a legal malpractice claim,” Judge Mark C. Miller wrote for the court. “Further supporting this finding is the (alleged) fact

Ex-Clients’ Malpractice Suit Against Ohio Attorney, Firm Reinstated for Representation in Underlying Child Custody Matter Read More »

Compare Listings

Title Price Status Type Area Purpose Bedrooms Bathrooms