“Mr. Berkheimer suffered catastrophic injuries from a bone contained in a menu item unambiguously advertised as ‘boneless’ at every level of commerce. All we asked is that a jury be able to make a commonsense determination as to whether he should be able to recover for his injuries. But the court’s majority ruled otherwise, simultaneously denying him that opportunity, and rendering the word ‘boneless’ completely meaningless,” said plaintiff’s counsel, Robb S. Stokar, a Cincinnati attorney at Stokar Law.
West Virginia, North Dakota Among Latest Adopters of NextGen Bar Exam
The NextGen bar exam will replace the Uniform Bar Examination