“Ms. Braxton argues the district court erred in its construction of the deposition testimony because, as the nonmovant responding to Walmart’s motion for summary judgment, she, not Walmart, was entitled to all favorable factual inferences,” the opinion said. “But in so arguing, she necessarily concedes that the evidence she relies upon requires inference, which means it was not ‘direct.'”
‘Design of Private Websites’ Not a Governmental Task: 8th Circuit Sends Privacy Action Against Health Care Provider to State Court
In Doe v. SSM Health Care Corporation, John Doe brought
