“These misrepresentations also ensured that Siemens was always on the ‘right side’ of its guarantees (falsely reflecting cost savings) to the HHC, which ensured that Siemens would not be held responsible for failing to deliver the energy savings that it promised when it sought HUD approval,” according to the plaintiffs’ complaint.
State Appellate Court Blocks Jackson Lewis From Forcing Arbitration in Malpractice Suit
“In its arguments on appeal, law firm is, in essence,