“After carefully reviewing the record, we hold that had the trial court precluded admission of the challenged aspects of the Durrani collage and any reference to Durrani’s license revocations and the other lawsuits, the jury likely would have reached the same verdict,” wrote Judge Ginger S. Bock for the Ohio First District Court of Appeals. “Therefore, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendants’ motion for a new trial.”
‘Design of Private Websites’ Not a Governmental Task: 8th Circuit Sends Privacy Action Against Health Care Provider to State Court
In Doe v. SSM Health Care Corporation, John Doe brought
