“On this record, a reasonable jury could conclude that Marks was shot when he neither posed a threat to the officers or the public, nor was he fleeing or ignoring an officer’s commands. On the other hand, a jury might agree with Officer Bauer’s assessment of the situation and find his use of force was objectively reasonable,” the 8th Circuit said.
How an Olympic Athlete Leverages Sports Psychology to Win in Court
“If you want to be an all-around, complete trial lawyer,