“We recognize how respondent’s mental impairment affected his client representation, and we afford it due mitigating weight,” Justice Elizabeth D. Walker wrote on behalf of the court. “We also commend his actions to address it, and we acknowledge his continued efforts toward mental health recovery. But his impairment does not insulate him from meaningful sanctions.”
State Appellate Court Upholds $149M Punitive Damages Award Against Hyatt
In Dugan v. Hyatt Corporation, the three-judge panel rejected Hyatt’s
