“This case presents an issue of first impression,” said Gass. “Arizona’s appellate courts have accepted special action jurisdiction in cases involving motions to compel mental-health examinations but have not addressed whether non-expert witness testimony opens the door to a court-ordered examination for rebuttal purposes.”
Jury Should Decide Rail Co.’s Interpretation of Injured Worker’s Medical Report, Fed. Circuit Says, Reviving Discrimination Claim
The company argued that it did not view the plaintiff’s
