“The court finds that plaintiff is not seeking to impose a requirement that is different from the federal requirements, but rather, her claim is parallel to federal law because she is seeking to hold CVS accountable for labeling that she alleges is false, deceptive, and misleading,” U.S. District Judge Henry Edward Autrey for the Eastern District of Missouri wrote in a suit over CVS “non-drowsy” cold and flu medicine.
‘Design of Private Websites’ Not a Governmental Task: 8th Circuit Sends Privacy Action Against Health Care Provider to State Court
In Doe v. SSM Health Care Corporation, John Doe brought