10th Circuit Sides With Walmart for Employee Termination for Not Immediately Reporting Work Injury

“Ms. Braxton argues the district court erred in its construction of the deposition testimony because, as the nonmovant responding to Walmart’s motion for summary judgment, she, not Walmart, was entitled to all favorable factual inferences,” the opinion said. “But in so arguing, she necessarily concedes that the evidence she relies upon requires inference, which means it was not ‘direct.'”


You might also enjoy

Compare Listings

Title Price Status Type Area Purpose Bedrooms Bathrooms