“Ms. Braxton argues the district court erred in its construction of the deposition testimony because, as the nonmovant responding to Walmart’s motion for summary judgment, she, not Walmart, was entitled to all favorable factual inferences,” the opinion said. “But in so arguing, she necessarily concedes that the evidence she relies upon requires inference, which means it was not ‘direct.'”
Shareholder Derivative Lawsuit Filed Against Discover Financial On the Heels of CEO’s Aug. 15 Resignation
This complaint was first surfaced by Law.com Radar.